Rethink Your Life! Finance, health, lifestyle, environment, philosophy |
The Work of Art and The Art of Work Kiko Denzer on Art |
|
|
Cob Re: Particle Size DistributionJohn Hall hallsoi at netvigator.comThu Oct 22 08:24:42 CDT 1998
Otherfish at aol.com wrote: > > to john hall > so what are the relevant particle sizes? > clay? > silt? > sand? > > thanks > otherfishHello Otherfish. The clay is the binding agent (cement). Without it, you can't have cob. Like cement, it is not supposed to make up any more than the voids left by the coarser particles. If it does then you get shrinkage (everything else, silt sand and gravel is inertly stable, clay is not). The optimun mix is to get a well graded inert element (everything down from medium gravel to silt) to give as dense as possible a "skeleton", and then the clay should just fill the interstices (voids). If you overdo the clay, you get settlement and shrinkage. If you underdo it, you lose potential strength, weather resistance etc. That's why its important. Of course you do not need to be quite so scientific about it. Simple site trials can tell you how your cob will behave. Mix up a few variable (known) batches, compact a sample from each in a biscuit tin or similar (say a cubic foot), tip it out and leave it to cure. Measure with a tape (and weigh if you want to know declining moisture content) each sample on a regular basis until cured. Once you've got an idea of how much each sample is going to shrink, hit each one with a hammer and see how strong it is. Then choose your optimum mix, with respect to both shrinkage and strength. Very few sites will produce "optimum' grading with respect to gravel, sand, silt, and clay, but the most important concern is to ensure the clay content is as correct as is practically possible (assuming you are really serious about constructing long-term buildings out of the stuff). Only trying to be helpful, Best Regards, John (lived in cob for at least half his life) Hall
|