Rethink Your Life! Finance, health, lifestyle, environment, philosophy |
The Work of Art and The Art of Work Kiko Denzer on Art |
|
|
Cob building permits / Structural studies of cobBruno Kamps bruin98 at earthlink.netFri Dec 4 11:41:18 CST 1998
Hello to fellow cob enthusiasts, Dec. 3, 1998 I have recently built a cob cottage in the city of Eugene without permits and the building exceeds the 120 square foot rules. The city has given me a deadline of Jan. 15 the come up with a plan of action. They say I have three option 1. tear it down. 2. make the building 120 feet square (which is interesting considering its a round building) 3. submit an Alternate Materials & Methods Approval Application in which I have to list substantiating evidence (research reports, test results, scientific studies etc.) that proves claims of, or supports the proposed alternate. These tests need to be performed by a third party. January 15 is obviously not enough time to do all the specific tests and these tests would not extend even to the neighbors yard as they would have to perform the same tests because of the variability of the material. To get cob accepted on a larger level I think we need to go to the legislators. Mobil homes do not meet the structural requirements of other homes but yet they are permissible. Why? They have lobbying groups in Salem and lots of monetary support. Is there somebody out there who has a wall jack, an engineering degree, a mind for the future sustainability of planet earth, who would like to come here (635 W. 27th Place , Eugene) and do some demolition tests. Maybe this evidence exists. Is there energy out there to get a ballot initiative on cob accepted. As I see it cob has been around much longer than modern building techniques and materials and so if we are basing our concepts on longevity is it really an alternate material. Clear cuts are an alternate without a future. There is opportunity here to make cob a widely acceptable material.
|