Rethink Your Life! Finance, health, lifestyle, environment, philosophy |
The Work of Art and The Art of Work Kiko Denzer on Art |
|
|
Cob: Re:Cob wallsSANCO Enterprises <Paul & Mary Salas> chansey at earthlink.netThu Jul 8 00:36:09 CDT 1999
"Shannon C. Dealy" wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jun 1999, alexander neumann wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > Is there anyone who can confirm the prejudice that earthen indoor walls in > modern airthÃght houses make the indoor air too dry for humans and plants? And > that the walls get wet over time? > > Snipped > this is silly, the walls start off extremely wet and it can take a year or more > for a cob structure to dry to a stable moisture level. The only way for the > moisture level to start climbing again would be if you have a leak in the roof > or standing water at the base of the wall. Shannon, this is partially true. Our lab test have debunked some of these "lore" beliefs. Standing water at the base of a wall will not have a major effect on the the wall system as a whole. The capillary absorption of water into the cob or adobe wall at its base will be dependent on the density of the soil material and porosity of organic material. Water tends to wick up the wall only a few inches above the liquid level to which it is exposed. Roof leaks primarily erode the surface on which the water is running as opposed to saturating the wall. Absorption into the wall in this fashion is very limited even over prolonged periods. In our area there are numerous untreated earthen walls that are exposed to the elements all year long and surface weathering is about 1" per side in 20 years. We will have lab results on this later this year. > [SNIP] > > I can imagine that prejudice coming from old exterior walls after > "modernisation". > > There have been serious moisture problems inside the walls of old earthen > buildings that have been treated with modern exterior sealants and plasters. > These modern materials effectively seal the exterior of the wall, so that > moisture released into the interior of the building by the inhabitants from > breathing, cooking, washing, etc., cannot migrate out through the walls, so it > builds up over time in the wall near the exterior seal, and eventually can reach > levels which cause damage to the wall. True, there many recurring failures using modern coating applications, however the cause in the example is in question. If the above proposition is true and the wall had an interior plaster coat, the failure would occur on the interior wall surface long before the exterior would be affected. While cement and stucco coats do fail the primary cause is a failure in the coating (cracks) as opposed to vapor/moisture migrating through the wall. The coating failure usually has a lot of moisture in liquid form trapped between the cob/adobe surface and the exterior coating (usually cememt/stucco). Failures caused by moisture created by breathing and cooking, etc. is nearly impossible because in order to have an affect on the exterior surface, the entire wall would have to absorb sufficient liquid moisture to condense on the exterior coating. Here again if the belief in breathable interior/exterior coatings hold true, the vapor should migrate right through the exterior coating without causing damage to the wall or coating. However, if the conditions in the example were to happened there would probably be a collapse of the wall. At about 11% moisture content in a cob/adobe wall, the material holds its form and does not exhibit signs of moisture on the surface although there is a distinct color change and expansion is dependent on the amount of clay content in the base material. Detrimental effects if any are equal on both wall surfaces. At about 12.5% to 13.5% the material is nearly saturated, becomes pliable and moisture is visible. >From our experiences, once the moisture source is removed, capillary moisture migration toward the more dense and dry areas slows dramatically and moisture evaporation reverses and the more saturated surface dries quickly from the side that the moisture was introduced. Continued moisture penetration into the dry area is minimal. These findings are based on untreated and unplastered or stuccoed cob/adobe surfaces. Paul Salas SANCO Enterprises, LLC Albuq., NM
|