Rethink Your Life! Finance, health, lifestyle, environment, philosophy |
The Work of Art and The Art of Work Kiko Denzer on Art |
|
|
[Cob] cob and earthquakesDognyard dognyard at stockroom.caFri Feb 20 16:45:33 CST 2004
I just got a copy of Rammed Earth House by David Easton. I sat up until 1 AM looking through it, and it appears to have a great deal of information on seismic issues at the back of the book. I didn't go through it, because it's just not an issue in our area unless one wanted to overbuild for the heck of it, and because I was more or less skimming through. Since the author builds in California, there is obviously a lot of engineering and study going into code-allowed earth buildings in terms of the structural integrity of the building. Now I know that hand formed walls wouldn't have the same strength as a rammed wall, and he is building with rebar in the walls, etc., but he does mention that the thicker or more massively built the wall is - whether you use cement or lime stabilized soil, or just a "perfect" mix of 70 percent sand and 30 clay - or wether you use rebar in the walls - the more likely it is to survive an earthquake intact. He also illustrates the restoration of a small store (it had some cracked walls, but everything was still solidly standing) that had experienced at least one earthquake. I didn't read it all, but I think it was built prior to the 1930's and would have been rammed by hand and not a pneumatic tamper...and no rebar. So wall thickness, wall height and the quality of the clay/sand mixture used must count for an awful lot in terms how a building of sand and clay (and straw) would withstand seismic activity. I would think too that design considerations like well-placed buttresses and well-built interior walls would also help ensure that a wall doesn't come down in a direction you don't want it to (if it comes down at all). Karen Clouston Alberta
|