Rethink Your Life! Finance, health, lifestyle, environment, philosophy |
The Work of Art and The Art of Work Kiko Denzer on Art |
|
|
[Cob] cob shake test infodhowell at pickensprogressonline.com dhowell at pickensprogressonline.comThu May 17 13:52:51 CDT 2012
Ed, Understood about quality control. I must point out concrete mixes from scratch in a wheelbarrow can also have vastly different strengths according to the amount of water used. Adobe bricks? New Mexico Earthen Building Materials code states, "each of the tests prescribed in this section shall be applied to sample units selected at random at a ratio of five units per twenty-five thousand bricks to be used or at the discretion of the building official." Five out of 25,000 seems like a pretty unrepresentative number for the whole. Quality control can be done by performing tests at the foundation, sill height, and lintel height of the walls. Did you know the adobe code allows a psi of 250 and one out of five can have a psi less than that? We're talking about the same material just a different building procedure. Their code is a good guideline, but some things are questionable, such as it requires concrete stucco which is an accident waiting to happen according to the Devon Earth Building Association. A healthy topic that must be discussed, don't you think? Damon On May 17, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Henry Raduazo wrote: > The problem might be one of quality control. When you are mixing > something in a large batching machine (like a concrete mixer) you > have large 3-5 yard batches which are perfectly uniform. When you > have small crews making 1/27th of a yard batches on a tarp > asserting quality control is a nightmare. Every crew can not make > every batch the same let alone getting the 5 or 6 different crews > to make uniform batches. > I have been able to make uniform cob batches by mixing one ton > batches on a concrete slab with a rototiller. That might satisfy a > quality control person, but getting such anal persons to accept > hundreds of batches made by half a dozen different crews might be > expecting too much even if we had a code that described the > material in a way to differentiate acceptable cob from unacceptable > cob. > > Ed > On May 17, 2012, at 11:29 AM, dhowell at pickensprogressonline.com wrote: > >> Thanks Ron, >> As I mentioned; "but no paperwork which building officials will >> accept." >> >> >> On May 16, 2012, at 8:17 PM, Henry Raduazo wrote: >> >>>> but no paperwork which building officials will accept. >> >
|